<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Chris. wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20080228223932.54259EA51B8@mail.fastmail.ca"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:54 -0800, David Sparks wrote...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">rbldnsd_flags:-"-r /usr/local/etc/rbldnsd -f -v -v -c 1m \
-b 75.160.109.247/530 dnsbl.DOMAIN-1.TLD:ip4tset:clients \
dnsbl.DOMAIN-1.TLD:ip4set:hosts
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">1204196045 <internet IP here>
165.193.171.124.blackhole.nospammers.NET A IN: REFUSED/0/61
</pre>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Looks as though that rbldnsd refuses to bind to any IP's in the
loopback block. It happly binds to the Internet Routable IP/PORT I
give it. But will /not/ use either 127.0.0.2, or 127.0.0.3. Which
I've assigned to the two zones.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">It works for me ... try changing the -b 75.160.109.247/530 in your
rbldnsd_flags to 127.0.0.2. Better yet change it to 0.0.0.0/530 for
testing.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I'm not sure you understood me when I said rbldnsd wouldn't bind to
the loopback block. Here's some examples of the output:
-b 127.0.0.2/530
rbldnsd: unable to bind to 127.0.0.2/530: Can't assign requested address
-b 127.0.0.2
rbldnsd: unable to bind to 127.0.0.2: Can't assign requested address
-b 127.0.0.3/530
rbldnsd: unable to bind to 127.0.0.3/530: Can't assign requested address
... and so on.
Nothing else is bound to those IP's.
So like I said, the only difference between the two is the BIND version -
9.4 vs. 9.3. Which leads me to believe rbldnsd won't/doesn't
work the same on newer versions of BIND.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
--Chris H
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Cheers,
ds
--
Environmental thought: print this email in triplicate!
(ygolohcysp esrever)
_______________________________________________
rbldnsd mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rbldnsd@corpit.ru">rbldnsd@corpit.ru</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.corpit.ru/mailman/listinfo/rbldnsd">http://www.corpit.ru/mailman/listinfo/rbldnsd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->_________________________________________________________________
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fastmail.ca/">http://fastmail.ca/</a> - Fast Secure Web Email for Canadians
_______________________________________________
rbldnsd mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rbldnsd@corpit.ru">rbldnsd@corpit.ru</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.corpit.ru/mailman/listinfo/rbldnsd">http://www.corpit.ru/mailman/listinfo/rbldnsd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
I use BIND and rbldnsd on the same server here. I have BIND bound to
127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.4 and 209.172.152.4. I have rbldnsd bound to
209.172.152.6. Why do you need rbldnsd bound to the loopback? And if
BIND is bound to 127.0.0.1, I can understand why rbldnsd would not bind
to 127.0.0.x. I don't remember in this thread if you stated BIND was
bound to 127.0.0.1 or not.<br>
<br>
Lyle<br>
</body>
</html>