[Avcheck] Re: text message shouldn't be scanned?

[adi]

On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:32:56PM +0700, adi wrote:
> Seems you're right. Using smtp-source shows little differences:
> 

This is 'slightly' not true if using drweb (eval. version).
In this test, I compiled avcheck and avnull statically using
dietlibc.

avcheck:
adi:/data/src/snapshot-20011226/src/smtpstone> date && /usr/bin/time
./smtp-source -s 20 -m 100 -l 50000 -f adi -t null postfix
Wed Jan  2 00:39:12 JAVT 2002
0.12user 0.22system 0:12.09elapsed 2%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (225major+83minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Jan  2 00:40:16 home postfix/local[2339]: 148052023F:
to=<null@home.org>, relay=local, delay=53, status=sent (/dev/null)

avnull:
adi:/data/src/snapshot-20011226/src/smtpstone> date && /usr/bin/time
./smtp-source -s 20 -m 100 -l 50000 -f adi -t null postfix
Wed Jan  2 00:36:24 JAVT 2002
0.06user 0.27system 0:14.28elapsed 2%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (242major+83minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Jan  2 00:36:39 home postfix/local[1876]: 55D3C2023B:
to=<null@home.org>, relay=local, delay=5, status=sent (/dev/null)

May I come to conclusion that AvpDaemon is faster than drwebd? :-)

Regards,

P.Y. Adi Prasaja