[Avcheck] Re: text message shouldn't be scanned?

[adi]

On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:12:21PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Interesting results.  The bottom line should be the same, and 14sec
> with Avp should be greather than 15sec avnull...  Anyway, the difference
> between Avp and DrWeb is significant.

Ups.. forgot to mention that I set DRWEB_HEURISTIC_ON command flag,
while testing drwebd yesterday. Sorry ;-(

README.AVP mention about using avp with heuristic scanning on though.

Here is the result if I don't use DRWEB_HERURISTIC_ON (as avcheck
default will do):

avcheck:
adi:/data/src/snapshot-20011226/src/smtpstone> date && /usr/bin/time
./smtp-source -s 20 -m 100 -l 50000 -f adi -t null postfix
Wed Jan  2 19:10:48 JAVT 2002
0.12user 0.20system 0:09.78elapsed 3%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (225major+84minor)pagefaults 0swaps

last syslog:
Jan  2 19:11:04 home postfix/local[951]: 3ADC520238:
to=<null@home.org>, relay=local, delay=8, status=sent (/dev/null)

In this test, I use the same avcheck (compiled statically using
dietlibc).

Looks pretty fast, doesn't it? :-)

Regards,

P.Y. Adi Prasaja