[Avcheck] Announce: avcheck-0.91

[Ralf Hildebrandt]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:02:28PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:

>  a) in case of "traditional" content_filter, when all good mails are
>     reinjected back to postfix, set always_bcc *only* for smtpd that
>     is used by avcheck to reinject good mails back.  I.e., add additional
>     address for good mails only.

Oh, a very good idea. But are you sure that it's a smtpd option? I'd
think it's a (n)qmgr thing!
 
>  b) by modifying `infected' handler so it will strip one configured address
>     from a list of rcpts, as you proposed.  Note please that it's not
>     guaranteed to be present for any given invocation of content filter
>     (think of <filter>_destination_recipient_limit).
> 
> I'd use the first variant.  For second one, there is no safe way to
> implement this using standard Bourne shell (but bash and ksh should
> be ok), and this is why I don't think it's ok to add this feature
> directly to the "default" `infected' handler.  Here is an example
> code to implement this using bash features (untested - I'm writing
> this right in this email w/o an attempt to execute):
> 
>   rcpts=()
>   for rcpt; do
>     case "$rcpt" in
>       some@domain.tld) ;;
>       *) rcpts[${#rcpts[@]}]="$rcpt"
>          # yeah, array syntax is a bit cryptic... ;)
>     esac
>   done
>   set -- "${rcpts[@]}" # make $@
> 
> This code may become a *commented* part of default handler.  Should it?

Oh yes.
It may become commonplace to use always_bcc for one reason or another.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a)   Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de
Charite Campus Mitte                            Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze -             Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-916
echo Mhbqnrnes Stbjr | tr "[a-y]"  "[b-z]"