[rbldnsd] Question on requirements for inclusion of 127.0.0.2 in dnsbl list

[Matthew Sullivan]

William Leibzon wrote:

>
> I've been told by somebody that majority of dnsbl lists add 127.0.0.2 
> for purposes of testing that dnslbl is operational. Apparently its 
> also mentioned
> at http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-00.txt
> (Note: this ID has now expired and no longer offical IETF ID)
>
> I'm wondering what people on this list are doing and if it is in fact
> normal practice if it would make sense to have option at rbldnsd to
> automaticly answer on that ip if list did not contain it.


You would not want rbldnsd to do it for you as this would stop the 
ability to check for broken zones....

Yours

Mat