[rbldnsd] Question on requirements for inclusion of 127.0.0.2 in dnsbl list

[William Leibzon]

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Jon Lewis wrote:

> Exactly.  The point of having a standard entry such as 127.0.0.2 is that
> users can test for that entry in a dnsbl to make sure the dnsbl is
> working.  If that entry is missing, it may be a sign the zone is
> corrupt/incomplete.

Ok, I get the point ...

Now I still would like to find out if this (having 127.0.0.2) is considered
a normal practice for dnsbl operations or not?

---
William Leibzon
  mailto: william at completewhois.com
Anti-Spam and Email Security Research Worksite:
  http://www.elan.net/~william/emailsecurity/
Whois & DNS Network Investigation Tools:
  http://www.completewhois.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 1118 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.corpit.ru/pipermail/rbldnsd/attachments/20041108/fd716fc4/smime.bin