[rbldnsd] Question on requirements for inclusion of 127.0.0.2 in dnsbl list

[Jeff Chan]

On Monday, November 8, 2004, 6:10:57 PM, William Leibzon wrote:
> Now I still would like to find out if this (having 127.0.0.2) is considered
> a normal practice for dnsbl operations or not?

Yes, It's pretty standard to include 127.0.0.2 in RBLs as a
testpoint for exactly the reasons mentioned; to allow testing
to see that the RBL is functional at a basic level.

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc at surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/