[rbldnsd] Clarification please

[Matthew Sullivan]

David Cary Hart wrote:

>On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 07:25 +1000, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
>  
>
>>There is a problem with sizes.  If you have a listed entry of 10.0.0.1, 
>>and a whitelist for 10.0.0.0/8 the listing will be present - the 
>>exception is ignored.
>>
>>    
>>
>However, the reverse (which is the typical layout) will always work;
>That is to say, whitelisting 10.0.0.1 while listing 10. Right?
>  
>
That is correct.  Whitelisting upto and including /25 sized networks 
takes precedence.

Regards,

Matthew