[rbldnsd] I HATE BIND - please help

[Lyle Giese]

Chris. wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:43:54 -0800, David Sparks wrote...
>
>   
>>>>> rbldnsd_flags:-"-r /usr/local/etc/rbldnsd -f -v -v -c 1m \
>>>>> -b 75.160.109.247/530 dnsbl.DOMAIN-1.TLD:ip4tset:clients \
>>>>> dnsbl.DOMAIN-1.TLD:ip4set:hosts
>>>>>           
>>> 1204196045 <internet IP here>
>>> 165.193.171.124.blackhole.nospammers.NET A IN: REFUSED/0/61
>>>       
>>> Looks as though that rbldnsd refuses to bind to any IP's in the
>>> loopback block. It happly binds to the Internet Routable IP/PORT I
>>> give it. But will /not/ use either 127.0.0.2, or 127.0.0.3. Which
>>> I've assigned to the two zones.
>>>       
>> It works for me ... try changing the -b 75.160.109.247/530 in your
>> rbldnsd_flags to 127.0.0.2.  Better yet change it to 0.0.0.0/530 for
>> testing.
>>     
>
> I'm not sure you understood me when I said rbldnsd wouldn't bind to
> the loopback block. Here's some examples of the output:
>
> -b 127.0.0.2/530
> rbldnsd: unable to bind to 127.0.0.2/530: Can't assign requested address
>
> -b 127.0.0.2
> rbldnsd: unable to bind to 127.0.0.2: Can't assign requested address
>
> -b 127.0.0.3/530
> rbldnsd: unable to bind to 127.0.0.3/530: Can't assign requested address
>
> ... and so on.
> Nothing else is bound to those IP's.
> So like I said, the only difference between the two is the BIND version -
> 9.4 vs. 9.3. Which leads me to believe rbldnsd won't/doesn't
> work the same on newer versions of BIND.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to reply.
>
> --Chris H
>
>   
>> Cheers,
>>
>> ds
>>
>> --
>> Environmental thought: print this email in triplicate!
>> (ygolohcysp esrever)
>> _______________________________________________
>> rbldnsd mailing list
>> rbldnsd at corpit.ru
>> http://www.corpit.ru/mailman/listinfo/rbldnsd
>>     
> _________________________________________________________________
>     http://fastmail.ca/ - Fast Secure Web Email for Canadians
>
> _______________________________________________
> rbldnsd mailing list
> rbldnsd at corpit.ru
> http://www.corpit.ru/mailman/listinfo/rbldnsd
>   
I use BIND and rbldnsd on the same server here. I have BIND bound to
127.0.0.1, 192.168.x.4 and 209.172.152.4. I have rbldnsd bound to
209.172.152.6. Why do you need rbldnsd bound to the loopback? And if
BIND is bound to 127.0.0.1, I can understand why rbldnsd would not bind
to 127.0.0.x. I don't remember in this thread if you stated BIND was
bound to 127.0.0.1 or not.

Lyle
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.corpit.ru/pipermail/rbldnsd/attachments/20080228/77ca410c/attachment-0001.html