[rbldnsd] Question on requirements for inclusion of 127.0.0.2 in dnsbl list

[William Leibzon]

I've been told by somebody that majority of dnsbl lists add 127.0.0.2 for 
purposes of testing that dnslbl is operational. Apparently its also mentioned
at http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-00.txt
(Note: this ID has now expired and no longer offical IETF ID)

I'm wondering what people on this list are doing and if it is in fact
normal practice if it would make sense to have option at rbldnsd to
automaticly answer on that ip if list did not contain it.

---
William Leibzon
  mailto: william at completewhois.com
Anti-Spam and Email Security Research Worksite:
  http://www.elan.net/~william/emailsecurity/
Whois & DNS Network Investigation Tools:
  http://www.completewhois.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 1118 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.corpit.ru/pipermail/rbldnsd/attachments/20041108/d14a3e78/smime.bin